In the IT customer perspective three levels of significance
can be distinguished, that relate to the issues discussed in the IT-strategy
service-page:
 |
IT-availability,
reliability and performance (quality) and cost; the productivity
of the IT (competence of the IT and IT-organization).
|
 |
Information provision and
time-to-market to support the business processes;
IT-products and services for the business itself (IT-contribution
to the business).
|
 |
Information provision and
time-to-market to innovate and extend the business processes;
IT-products and services for the customers of the business
(realization of the business strategy with IT).
|
That IT is be productive, efficient, is actually a basic condition.
The quality should be in balance with the costs. The added value
of IT lies in the contribution to and realization of the business
strategy. From the support to the innovation of the business
with IT. From the support of business processes to the realization
of the business value proposition.
IT-contribution and realization respectively relate to the internal
and customer perspective of the business strategy. In the financial/results
perspectives they make up the added value of IT to the business
strategy. The IT-competence determines the IT-productivity. For
the business as the owner of the IT (and IT-department) the added
value of IT and the IT-productivity result in the owner value
of IT. Similar to the shareholder value in the business strategy:

For the business the steps from competence via contribution
to realization make up the growth path in IT-value. For the IT-organization
these are different value propositions to the business though.
As is shown in the figure above, the value proposition of the
IT does not have to be the same as the value proposition of the
business. Just as in the value proposition of the business, a
choice has to be made in the IT-value proposition. That choice
depends on the maturity of the IT-organization and the ambition
of the business with its IT. The key question is: how should
the IT-organization deliver added value to the business?
 |
Efficient for itself?
|
 |
Efficient for the business?
|
 |
Or doesn't that matter, as
long as the IT generates extra turnover for the business?
|
An IT-organization that is efficient for itself, manages its
resources more careful. Sometimes the business then has to wait
for these resources. The other way round an IT-organization that
is efficient for the business takes up more costs, because its
resources sometimes have to wait for the business. In case an
IT-organization tries to aim at both, the consequence can be
that no efficiency is achieved, neither for the IT nor for the
business. If the IT-costs have to be reduced, while the contribution
has to be increased, the business should realize whether her
ambition with IT is in proportion to the maturity of the IT-organization.
By means of the table below both the ambition with IT and the
maturity of the IT-organization can be assessed. The differences
indicate the path of growth to be followed. With that for each
path of growth feasible objectives can be formulated in time:

[source: 'Enabling the strategy focussed IT-organization', Robert S.
Gold, Harvard Business School Publishing, 2001]
On the basis of analysis, such as these, the outlines of your
IT-strategy are charted fast. A first rough draft can usually
be delived within weeks. The full elaboration and implementation
should not take more than a few months. You can do that yourself
or have it taken care of by HIT. In practice a collaboration
works best. Then HIT provides the support on the combined standard
methods and techniques with direct deployable templates and tools.
This way you remain in control and build up knowledge in your
organization fast.

|